(mis)conceptions of (un)expected student writing
enter: chorus of trepidation, consideration, and action. sing from the homogeneity of what writing is. listen closer, the notes hum discord. breaking from the chorus, we can hear a line: what does it mean to publish student writing?
Breaking from the chorus, Chelsea Lonsdale, Becky Morrison , and I, graduate students and instructors invested in the teaching of composition, desire to amplify this, gain volume with the addition of voices. We question, what does it mean to publish student writing, pulling threads to follow in inquiry: audience, what (student) writing (what it can(not) look like/sound like) is, and what publishing is/isn’t/can/can’t be.
I am unraveling what it means to publish (verb. action?):
1. prepare and issue for public sale
2. print in a book or journal so as to make it generally known
3. prepare and issue the works of a particular writer
4. formally announce or read
There are further threads, to publish as an adjective (descriptor?) too: publishable, from the stem of Old French puplier; from Latin publicare, to ‘make public’; from publicus, a blend of Latin poplicus ‘of the people’ and pubes ‘adult’. At a public university, how is the action of publishing envisioned? And where does that definition come from? HowWhy does(n’t) student writing become published?
How can we negotiate the spaces of dichotomy in what is (un)/expected?
exeunt: notions of singularity, static frames, and temples of paper
enter (not to exit): questioning our ideologies, methodologies, (in)actions